Speeding up heart rate helps heart failure patients with stiff hearts

heart rate

New research published in JAMA Cardiology from the University of Minnesota Medical School and University of Vermont’s Larner College of Medicine found evidence that speeding up the heart rate with pacemakers may help patients who often experience shortness of breath.

More than 75 million Americans have high blood pressure accompanied by heart muscle thickening and more than three million of these patients suffer from heart failure, a leading cause of hospital admissions and healthcare costs. In heart failure with a stiff heart muscle, the heart is less able to relax and refill with blood. By implementing a tailored acceleration of heart rates, researchers can reduce congestion and improve the circulation of blood.

“We have tried the same medications that work for weak heart failure with limited success. For example, beta-blockers save many lives in weak heart failure, but in patients with stiff hearts, they are likely harmful by slowing the heart rate and increasing the congestion of blood in the heart,” said Markus Meyer, MD, Ph.D., an associate professor at the U of M Medical School and the Lillehei Heart Institute. “In this study, we tested if the opposite of beta-blockers, speeding up the heart rate with pacemakers, helps these patients.”

Heart failure occurs when the heart cannot adequately meet the body’s demands. About half of heart failure patients have a stiff heart with a normal pumping function but poor heart muscle relaxation—known as heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The other half of heart failure patients have an enlarged and weak heart with a reduced pumping function, called heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. This condition has many effective therapies.

“This study provides incremental evidence that higher heart rates—within the normal range—and not lower heart rates may be beneficial for patients with preclinical or overt HFpEF,” said Margaret Infeld, MD, MS, a cardiac electrophysiology fellow at the University of Vermont’s Larner College of Medicine and the study’s lead investigator. She added that HFpEF is a diverse multisystem disease with few available therapies.

The research team sought to explore if raising the pacemaker rate to a more normal resting rate, based on patient body size, would improve outcomes in patients with stiff hearts. The patients paced at faster heart rates reported feeling markedly better and were less congested. In addition, patients were more active and had less atrial fibrillation—a common heart rhythm disorder associated with heart failure.

“These results are provocative,” said Daniel Lustgarten, MD, Ph.D., a UVM professor of medicine and co-author of the study. “It is very important to emphasize that the pacemakers in this study were implanted in a way that is very different from traditional pacemakers; traditional pacemakers would likely not show these benefits and, in fact, could even be harmful in some patients.”

The research team believes these promising findings warrant further research to confirm the safety and benefits of this new treatment approach. They plan to continue studying the optimal pacing rates and confirm their results in extensive studies that involve many medical centers.

More information:
Margaret Infeld et al, Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, JAMA Cardiology (2023). DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320

Journal information:
JAMA Cardiology

Source: Read Full Article